Iman Farooqui

Strawberry Crest Highschool IB
Class of 2025

Collaborated with a group of the world’s premier researchers, professors, and professionals in the fields of neuroscience and neuroethics.

Synthesized new neuroscience knowledge into an ethical analysis for cutting-edge neuroscience research.

Engaged in interactive, cross-cultural activities and discussions about cognitive neuroscience and neuroethics through a biopsychosocial lens.

Learn more about Iman here.

Iman is ecstatic to be attending the Advanced Medical Neuroscience Internship program. She is extremely interested in the anatomy and physiology of the brain and is passionate about neuroscience. She hopes to explore the inner workings of the brain and this program will allow her to do that.

Iman is a rising junior at Strawberry Crest High School and is taking IB and AP classes. She ia the historian of HOSA, and is an executive board member of a club called Chargerthon which is an organization that fundraises for John Hopkins Children’s Network and raises money for cancer research. In addition, Iman plays the piano and frequently performs at recitals and practical exams. Iman is also a Junior Officer in her school’s Red Cross club and is currently volunteering at Moffit Cancer hospital. In the future, Iman hopes to pursue a career in medicine and strives to make healthcare more accessible and affordable.

Iman is excited to explore the electrical signals fired by neurons to higher-order cognitive functions like memory, emotion, and morality. She is also eager to learn about the future of neuro modulation and implement neuro technology to control the motion of live cockroaches.

Read more about Iman’s achievements here.

My Ethical Investigation Research

My research analysis explored the necessary questions and implications to consider while pursuing research about Pediatric PTSD and its future. Using what can be done in neuroscience, we created an exploration of what should be done.  

In order to answer this question, I reviewed the literature to make informed conclusions about the current status and stances of Pediatric PTSD . I then devised a guide and framework to recommend with the aim of ensuring that a thorough, holistic ethical review of Pediatric PTSD is conducted as its findings progress.

Our analysis suggests that Pediatric PTSD will have the following implications that need to be anticipated and addressed: Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) stems from exposure to traumatic events that elicit “fear, helplessness, or horror” and are associated with dysregulated fear responses (Parsons, Ressler). Traumatic events are characterized by the perceived profound risk of harm to self, to others, and the lack of escapability. Two-thirds of American children experience at least one instance of trauma before they are sixteen years old (Winerman). However, PTSD differs from normal fear responses with the “lack of recovery and/ or worsening of symptoms” following trauma-related exposure (Parsons, Ressler). Symptom manifestations on the PTSD spectrum include up-regulation of the cortisol feedback loop, “re-experiencing traumatic events, … avoidance symptoms, …and psycho-physiological reactivity to trauma-related stimuli” (Parsons, Resslers). Symptoms associated with PTSD can severely interfere with executive function and alter the neurobiological development of children. The consistent elevated levels of cortisol in children lead to decreased development of the prefrontal cortex, and alters a variety of the child’s neurological systems (Bellis). Pediatric PTSD is treated primarily through psychotherapeutic methods, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). For severe pediatric PTSD, current pharmacological treatments include selective and non-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines, all of which have abuse and tolerance potential (Parsons, Resslers). Propranolol, however, as a beta blocker, is considered a non-addictive medication, making it a safer candidate for children. Propranolol is currently in use as a prescription-based medication for high blood pressure and has been experimentally proven to decrease emotional connection to traumatic memories in adults(Xin et. al.) and adults (Thierre et. al.).

My Ethical Analysis
Presentation

Leadership Initiatives is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that is dedicated to creating future leaders across the globe through experiential learning. In the Advanced Medical Neuroscience Internship, I worked directly with some of the world’s leading scientists to learn about neuroethics, neurocognitive health, and revolutionary developments in the field.

At the conclusion of the internship, I presented my research to an esteemed panel of judges, including Dr. James Giordano, Chief of Georgetown University’s Neuroethics Studies Program. 

In order to address the discourse and illuminate the ethical considerations while reviewing the research about Pediatric PTSD for the judges.

The Frontier of Neuroscience

Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging

The Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging (CFMI) at Georgetown is one of the world’s leading institutions with expertise in structural, functional, and brain imaging.

While visiting the CFMI, I met Dr. Ashley VanMeter, Director of the Neuroimaging Corps at Georgetown University, who described to me the rationale, protocols, capabilities, and limitations of functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical and basic science applications.

I not only learned about the science behind fMRI, but also had the opportunity to see a machine that possesses a magnetic power of 30,000 times the strength of Earth’s magnetic field.

Neuromodulation

Neuromodulation is a technology that electrically stimulates nerves or chemically targets neurological sites to treat a vast array of conditions and symptoms. 

I specifically learned about transcranial direct current stimulation and the neuromodulation devices available for public purchase. These technologies provide external electrical stimulation through a helmet or headband of electrodes.

To further demonstrate the applications of neuromodulation, we learned about electrical stimulation, perception of stimuli, and used the electrical activity captured from flexing my own muscle to contract the muscle of another intern. Through this, we could control each other’s arms!

Internship Highlights

I had the chance to work and collaborate directly with Dr. James Giordano, Chief of Georgetown University’s Neuroethics Studies Program. 

In addition to his involvement with a variety of educational institutions, Dr. Giordano is the author of over 350 publications in neuroscience and neuroethics.

During our first meeting, Dr. Giordano guided us through an exploration of our own brains, minds, and selves, probing for the problems, meanings, and questions within the world that surrounds us.

In subsequent meetings, Dr. Giordano frequently prompted both introspection and extrospection to encourage familiarity with our own minds, as well as our environment, and how the two can interact to our benefit.

I had the unique opportunity to learn from Dr. Michael Okun, a neurologist, neuroscientist, and founder of the University of Florida’s Movement Disorders Program. 

The university’s program aims to provide interdisciplinary and integrated care that facilitates communication between all members of their team to provide the best care possible.

Within his work, Dr. Okun utilizes Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), which operates like a pacemaker within the brain and is often inserted via conscious surgery.

During this operation, electrodes are put in the brain to regulate electrical signals and help with conditions like Epilepsy, Parkinson’s Disease, Dystonia, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Essential Tremor.

I had the opportunity to discuss stimulating creativity through brain science with Dr. Adam Green, the Director of the Lab for Relational Cognition at Georgetown University.

Dr. Green maintains that creative insights are “the product of connections made between things other people didn’t put together,” and we explored the neurological foundations of this theory.

In one of his most prominent experiments, Dr. Green had participants draw the analogies to evaluate semantic distance and creativity as explained above, but also regarded the potential role of neuromodulation.

tDCS is transcranial direct current stimulation, which is a non-invasive “helmet” of sorts that allows for the modification of the neural pathways’ firing in the brain. The external stimulator is placed on the scalp and then provides electrical stimulation to a broad region in order to control the neurons’ firing. We also had  a chance to observe and try neurofeedback technology that uses how we learn to help us train our brains in real time!

Along with Dr. Giordano, I had the opportunity to work closely with Dr. Rachel Wurzman, a Dana Foundation Fellow in Neuroscience and Society. 

Dr. Wurzman encouraged us to think critically about the questions that help drive science forwards and improve our understanding of the world around us through a biopsychosocial lens. She also lent her expertise of neuroplasticity, neurodiversity, and neuroethics to help our team develop our research proposal. 

In addition to our work with Dr. Wurzman, we had the opportunity to meet with a variety of neuroscientists with a variety of unique specialities. 

One such professional was Dr. Fernando Pagan, a Georgetown Neurologist and the Director of Movement Disorders, who is a nationally recognized leader in Parkinson’s Disease treatment. We were able to learn about Movement Disorders from various perspectives as Dr. Pagan was joined by Captain Rick Schena, who lives with Parkinson’s and explains how his treatment plan allows him to still do what he would like to do.